To: albionin
You’ve now turned your attention to the obvious physical limitations of cars, rather than to the concept of speed.
If the physical universe, which includes light, had a beginning, would not light have had to accelerate to get to its current speed? Or did it just get to its current speed magically?
64 posted on
09/01/2012 10:11:07 PM PDT by
EternalVigilance
(The saving of America starts the day Christians stop supporting what they say they hate.)
To: EternalVigilance
If the physical universe, which includes light, had a beginning, would not light have had to accelerate to get to its current speed? Or did it just get to its current speed magically?
No, it doesn't "need" to accelerate, and no, it's not magical. Light, when emitted, propagates at the speed of light instantly, without any "acceleration." That is part and parcel of quantum physics.
65 posted on
09/01/2012 10:13:29 PM PDT by
Oceander
(TINSTAAFL - Mother Nature Abhors a Free Lunch almost as much as She Abhors a Vacuum)
To: EternalVigilance
I was showing how the comparison wasn’t valid. The question has to be answered what reason is there to believe that light was ever traveling faster in order to travel 13.7 billion years in 6,000. Light would have to be zipping along at more than 2 million times C and then slam on the brakes at the last minute. That is an extraordinary claim and has to be proved.
69 posted on
09/01/2012 10:31:01 PM PDT by
albionin
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson