Some women are ‘short-waisted’ which may or may not be in style (results in nice long legs but compresses the torso in dresses and blouses). Some are long-waisted which creates an elegant long torso but, unlike Michele Pfiefer, often results in shorter legs that may not look good in skirts. Some ladies have very narrow shoulders, some have broad. Flat chested or pendulous breasts. Problem skin (even with dermatology) or porcelain skin. Some have an “athletic build” and therefore a low waist to hip ratio like Jane Fonda had until she had ribs removed to get more of an hour glass look. We’re talking bone structure and genetics and hopefully stopping short of having ribs removed and not pigs or slobs. And note that the men who sought these model women were often not model men. Unfortunately, like the impossible advertisement above, men are being bombarded with impossible cosmetics standards for the male physique too but the women are way out ahead of them.
Fashions for women today favor a specific type: one with a concave belly and slight hips. Even my 5'7" 127 lb daughter doesn't look good in those ridiculous low-rise jeans (originally designed for men). Women shouldn't be so concerned with trends, but wear what looks good on them,, so idiot men can see that various feminine body types are attractive with clothes on as well as without.
What happened to the days when a man appreciated all beautiful, nude female forms: slightly plump yet firm, curvy, athletic, petite, tall, or naturally thin?
If a man is only attracted to plasticized, hairless, orange-fleshed women with silicone butts and boobs, who have tattooed makeup & hair extensions, and have plastic surgery to remove their ribs & make their vulvas "pretty," those men might as well go full-hog and date a transexual, not a real woman.
And the Asians are getting closer to creating realistic sexbots... ;-)