To: Family Guy
I am unsure if another movie adaptation of a famous novel is really a movie “remake”. Unless they took the screenplay and remade it.
If it was written to be a movie - it was a movie - then a decade or more later they decide to re-make the movie - THAT is a remake.
A different adaptation of a beloved novel - not so much.
As to those citing SEQUELS - well what can be said about being unclear on the concept?
66 posted on
08/03/2012 2:11:32 PM PDT by
allmendream
(Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
To: allmendream
You're right. Another movie adaptation of a famous novel should probably not be considered a remake.
OK, here are a couple of remakes where the remake is better in many ways than the original, but the original still has good qualities that the remakes have lost. I like to watch both the original and the remake because I get different things from them.
The Man Who Knew Too Much
and
The Ring (Ringu)
79 posted on
08/03/2012 2:31:42 PM PDT by
Family Guy
(A society's first line of defense is not the law but customs, traditions and moral values. -Williams)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson