Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Varda
The original Scythians were an Iranian-speaking group related to the Persians and Medes (and more distantly to the Aryans who invaded India).

Late ancient authors, dealing with various ethnic groups not mentioned in earlier historians, often applied to them the names of unrelated people who had lived in the same area many centuries earlier who were mentioned by Herodotus and other early writers. So tribes living north of the Black Sea might be called Scythians even if not really Scythian. It may be that Bede was following that practice (although the original Scyths were never as far west as Britain).

49 posted on 07/30/2012 6:29:12 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: Verginius Rufus

I also had read that calling peoples “Scythian” for anyone from above the Black Sea was common practice in late antiquity. Bede was a learned churchman known as a great scholar and it’s hard to imagine he would use that word while trying to describe Scandinavians. The horse culture of the Picts doesn’t square with Scandinavians anyway.


51 posted on 07/30/2012 1:25:43 PM PDT by Varda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson