[rollo tomasi]

Not a purist by any stretch since that is impossible. Probably will wind up voting against Obama but will keep the marshmallows out when the budgets start burning out of control (70 year bill comes due). History teaches us eventually any free spending society will run into an ugly course. The course I believe in the next stage will be is some type of “totalitarian” control which certain types of Repubs will sign off to in order to appeal towards some type of pragmatic stability. Usually goes in that direction until the masses revolt, rinse repeat etc... through the ages.

I guess perplexed how society keeps electing the Parliament of Whores since we are really in control through our votes and God given intellect. I guess apathy against true liberty is America's greatest “strength” at the moment. Oh, we'll, lol.

[sauropod]

I share your worries.

I put it to LIVs (low information voters).

Just look at Facebook to see what i mean.

[KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle]

Not a purist by any stretch since that is impossible. Probably will wind up voting against Obama

Ditto... and that's what inevitably causes me to snort in derision at the shriller, more hysterical CINO apologists within the (purportedly) "ABO" camp. As I've repeatedly informed them: I AM voting for someone other than Obama (i.e., "Anyone But Obama.").

That only seems to make them more sulky, rather than less. ;)

[bigheadfred]

Pay me now or pay me later.

Me? I just as soon pay now.