To: sauropod
Not a purist by any stretch since that is impossible. Probably will wind up voting against Obama but will keep the marshmallows out when the budgets start burning out of control (70 year bill comes due). History teaches us eventually any free spending society will run into an ugly course. The course I believe in the next stage will be is some type of “totalitarian” control which certain types of Repubs will sign off to in order to appeal towards some type of pragmatic stability. Usually goes in that direction until the masses revolt, rinse repeat etc... through the ages.
I guess perplexed how society keeps electing the Parliament of Whores since we are really in control through our votes and God given intellect. I guess apathy against true liberty is America's greatest “strength” at the moment. Oh, we'll, lol.
143 posted on
07/27/2012 6:22:06 PM PDT by
rollo tomasi
(Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians)
To: rollo tomasi
I share your worries.
I put it to LIVs (low information voters).
Just look at Facebook to see what i mean.
145 posted on
07/27/2012 6:26:00 PM PDT by
sauropod
(You can elect your very own tyranny - Mark Levin)
To: rollo tomasi
Not a purist by any stretch since that is impossible. Probably will wind up voting against ObamaDitto... and that's what inevitably causes me to snort in derision at the shriller, more hysterical CINO apologists within the (purportedly) "ABO" camp. As I've repeatedly informed them: I AM voting for someone other than Obama (i.e., "Anyone But Obama.").
That only seems to make them more sulky, rather than less. ;)
146 posted on
07/27/2012 6:26:34 PM PDT by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
("If you're not fiscally AND socially conservative, you're not conservative!" - Jim Robinson, 9-1-10)
To: rollo tomasi
Pay me now or pay me later.
Me? I just as soon pay now.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson