Replies

The problem for you, Ziegler and the other Paterno apologist is that the shower victim has come forward now.

No -- the problem for this shower victim's lawyers in the civil trial will be whose testimony to affirm in this incident: Paterno's saying something of a sexual nature did occur according to McQueary which was set aside by the jury or McQueary's doctor saying that he reported that it wasn't sexual which was relied upon by the jury.

That jury decision presents a problem for Freeh's Report that he conveniently avoided. And it will present a problem for any prosecution of Curry, et al because McQueary will get torn apart on the stand.

The Freeh Report has this statement written about five times “No record or communication indicates that anyone made any effort to determine the identity of the child in the shower or whether the child had been harmed.”

That's not exactly true. Since the boy was from The Second Mile, they notified the Second Mile of the incident. What did the Second Mile do with the information??? Did Freeh follow that trail???

No — the problem for this shower victim's lawyers in the civil trial will be whose testimony to affirm in this incident: Paterno’s saying something of a sexual nature did occur according to McQueary which was set aside by the jury or McQueary’s doctor saying that he reported that it wasn't sexual which was relied upon by the jury.

That jury decision presents a problem for Freeh’s Report that he conveniently avoided. And it will present a problem for any prosecution of Curry, et al because McQueary will get torn apart on the stand.

McQueary already testified once, and his testimony wasn't “torn apart”. I hope the shower victim wins and gets everything he deserves. And when he does win the civil trial and even more evidence emerges Penn State will look even worse. These children were mostly all attacked at Penn State. There were two more boys attacked in Penn States showers in 2001, after this incedent was swepped under the rug.

That's not exactly true. Since the boy was from The Second Mile, they notified the Second Mile of the incident. What did the Second Mile do with the information??? Did Freeh follow that trail???

That is entirely true. The Freeh report even states that Sandusky, when contacted by Spanier, offered up the name of the child but Spanier refused this knowledge. Penn State didn't notify Second Mile until a full month after the incident. And Spanier completely played down what took place. Spanier never even mentioned what happened to Penn States Counsel.

Paterno et al never wanted to know the identity of the child.