Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: longtermmemmory
"[D]epends on state law."

I just quoted state law - establishments are required to have the 30.06 sign posted if they do not want any CHL carriers on their premises. If that sign is there, you may not enter carrying concealed.

If not there, you may enter carrying concealed.

In any situation where the 30.06 sign is not there, but they have other signs like "NO GUNS" or the pistol with the slash through it, I'll walk right in carrying concealed because any sign other than the 30.06 sign is unenforceable.
83 posted on 07/20/2012 11:12:36 AM PDT by FortWorthPatriot (Obama is no Hitler; Hitler got the Olympics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: FortWorthPatriot
In any situation where the 30.06 sign is not there, but they have other signs like "NO GUNS" or the pistol with the slash through it, I'll walk right in carrying concealed because any sign other than the 30.06 sign is unenforceable.

Furthermore, the attempt to enforce such is obviously a 18 USC 242 case.
The same might be provable in a 30.06 case, but that'd take a lot of legal legwork.

98 posted on 07/20/2012 8:16:33 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson