What kind of “scientists” is this such a revelation to??
Let’s see:
Green plants, on land or in the ocean, love and absorb CO2, retaining the carbon from it for growth and respirating the oxygen (that much of the animal kingdom needs).
Why would not more atmospheric CO2 (a) be a boon to the growth of green plants, on land and in the oceans, and (b) create the condition (more green plants) that would absorb more of the atmospheric CO2???
Logic says there would be no mystery to such an outcome.
Maybe too many “scientists” today did not choose courses in logic when they attended college. Maybe they didn’t even acquire logic skills before college.
And paid them to support it!
My climate/meteorology professor taught us this at the University of Wyoming 25 years ago, before global warming was “cool”. He explained to our “skulls full of mush” that this effect would negate any real increase in CO2. Gosh, pretty amazing from a Land Grant College!