Unfortunately, I cannot find those numbers in the 1860 census. Nor are they consistent with the findings of others census.
“Income” was not a concept in use in 1860 either.
And you have made several conflicting claims as to what those figures are.
Yes you can. But they have to be derived, as many historians have already done. You take the value of personal property totals and divide by the populations. Others have done it for you, and I have quoted those sources on more than 10 posts.
To repeat it again for you, a primary source that shows the exact per capita figures I have given you comes from William Parker, "Slavery and Southern Economic Development, The Structure of the Cotton Economy of the Antebellum South", 1970. here
Then you say: "Nor are they consistent with the findings of others census.
Then show where other census data was inconsistent. Documentaion.
“Income” was not a concept in use in 1860 either.
Actually it was. See here
You said: "And you have made several conflicting claims as to what those figures are."
Name them.