Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PeaRidge

You are a LIAR. I never mentioned “free” population until I analyzed the data you provided trying to prove per capita income higher in the South.

When I realized the fraud you were attempting I pointed out how you were attempting it.

You do realize “per capita” is based upon the ENTIRE population?


450 posted on 08/27/2012 3:18:24 PM PDT by arrogantsob (Obama MUST Go. Sarah herself supports Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 449 | View Replies ]


To: arrogantsob
You said: “You are a LIAR. I never mentioned “free” population”

Really.

Here from your post # 245: “..Such as the FACT that the free population of the North was larger than that of the South by at least 3 to 1. It also had a higher per capita income.”

You were wrong. Time to admit it. Here is the truth:

The per capita income of free populations in 1860 as complled by the United States Census was the following:

........................South..............North

...........................$150................$142

Sources: Fogel & Engerman (1860 Census), Wm. Parker

452 posted on 08/28/2012 8:28:04 AM PDT by PeaRidge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 450 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson