[lonevoice]

If I recall correctly, I once saw a Quix post where he said he was completely insolvent and was living with his parents. I never saw the claim of him being a psychologist. Imma call bovine excrement on that one.

[OwenKellogg]

If I recall correctly, I once saw a Quix post where he said he was completely insolvent and was living with his parents. I never saw the claim of him being a psychologist. Imma call bovine excrement on that one.

---

He referred to his PhD in Psychology credentials numerous times (while accusing others of making “Type II errors” and other wild projections). Never heard about him living with his parents, but he did claim to be broke several times. And asexual.

[greyfoxx39]

Imma call bovine excrement on that one.

I have run across a few of Quix' posts through the years. IMO they are ALL questionable. I think he is an alcoholic, possibly a dry drunk and showing all kinds of symptoms of it including a huge case of grandiosity.

See, if Quix can do long distance psychology so can I!

[trisham]

To: Onerom99
Actually, from where this psychologist sits . . .

your assertion indicates that label more fits the bloke in your mirror.

36 posted on May 24, 2009 12:33:16 PM EDT by Quix
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2257350/posts?page=36#36

To: JoJo Gunn; Las Vegas Dave
Now, JoJo,

That’s too beneath you. I mean, don’t even naysayers have SOME code of conduct?

You made all kinds of noise about the photos and the details. Eventually Las Vegas Dave helped you make a fool of yourself by all your ranting etc. etc. etc. about that photo.

Then he let you know that he personally took the photo and has the 35mm film results.

Now tell me . . .

IF the shoe was on the other foot . . .

would

YOU

turn such a film over to such a cantankerous, contrary, negative, slippery, bait-and-switch, nonsensical etc. sort of hostile opponent?

As a psychologist, I wouldn’t consider such a move overly sane.

It’s likely that Dave could give you whatever specs on the film and photo. He could even turn the film over to an independent expert.

However, I doubt it’s worth his bother. NO FACTS seem to have the slightest influence on your understanding or ability to deal more remotely charitably with the truth.

On that photo issue, I think you get a failing grade big time . . . well earned.

32 posted on April 7, 2009 8:15:15 PM EDT by Quix
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2224087/posts?page=32#32

[ArrogantBustard]

I have long contended—primarily because of my experiences as a psychology professor but also due to my experiences as a clinical psychologist that ATTACHMENT DISORDER was PRIMARILY the responsibility of poor fathering.

Quote from post number 9 on that thread.

Quix has claimed for years to be a psychology professor (or possibly an instructor at a community college), and a practicing psychologist. I cannot vouch for the veracity of those claims, only for their existence. Google is your friend ...