So electing a socialist POS for a second term will work?
Really?
Considering that the only other option is Republican socialist POS for a first term, as opposed to a DEMOCRAT socialist POS for a second term, yes. In what world does electing a liberal statist help fight liberal statism? Especially when that liberal statist you elect is the de-facto head and most powerful member of the only political party positioned to oppose the liberal statist agenda?
That's nuts!
In ANY case, a vote FOR a plurality via third party to weaken the victory of whichever socialist POS wins, holds absolutly zero sway over whether the Democrat or the Republican wins. Those of us who vote third party are forfeiting any influence in how that question is settled. We aren't voting for either of them -- we're voting for weakening the popular mandate of whichever bastard wins.
Of course, the entitlement-minded among us don't get that. They wrongly calculate that any refusal to vote for Romney is a vote "for" Obama because they believe in their hearts that the Republican, no matter how much a socialist POS, is entitled to a conservative's vote; they are as wrong as folks on welfare who think they're entitled to the fruits of conservatives' labor.