Then why are you pushing for Romney? That is complete capitulation to the liberal agenda because of your own defeatism. YOU are the defeatist, not me. It is clear as day.
As for your righteous indignation and claims that others are guilty of "irrationality and dishonesty," your own distorted view of fellow Patriots who have the audacity to disagree with you, is amply demonstrated in just a few of your random gems posted within the past week or so, such as:
the FR He-Man Mitt Haters Club ... ad naseum, like about a thousand times a day ...
And yet there was none of the lies and hysteria directed at [Romney] and his supporters that you see on every political thread these days on FR.
These days Free Republic is all about quitting. ...
Obviously the real priority here on FR is to make sure Obama is re-elected.
And when all else fails, you defile yourself by playing play the Mormon Bigotry card:
There are many people on FR these days who dishonestly seek to waste the time of those who hate Romney less than they do. Why is that? One word: Mormonism. .....
But the most sickeningly hypocritical of all, referring to a person who has and continues to promote the gay agenda such that parents are denied their right to prevent "outreach" of homosexuality to their own children, and adoption agencies must either close shop or relinquish children entrusted to them to homosexual "parents" (that's what happened in Massachusetts -- you can look it up):
I will obey Him, and continue to fight for what I believe is right.
No, in the name of political expediency, you are fighting to elect to the top position of power in the U.S. a person you KNOW is part of "causing little ones to stumble."
You mean to vote "against" Obama but you obstinately refuse to acknowledge the fact that your vote "against" Obama is a vote FOR causing the Republican party to capitulate to liberal dominance in its own ranks. Come 2013, the ONLY thing that will count is what you voted FOR.
It's why I'm voting for a plurality by voting for third party. You claim to be "honest," but are not honest enough to face squarley what you are voting FOR.
Your own brand of falsehood, defeatism and dishonesty fairly leaps off the screen. To see you lecturing folks, to see you presuming to lecture Jim Robinson -- well, it's enough to instill me more and more with confidence that my thinking has led me to the correct position in declining Romney and voting for a plurality via third party. I'm on the better side of this, because character counts. Character DOES matter. You can tell a lot about Romney by the behavior of his supporters.
I have already explained at length, on this thread and elsewhere, why I am campaigning and voting for Romney, and why I believe that this is not a capitulation to the liberal agenda. In short, I expect a Pres. Romney's policies and appointments would be substantially more conservative than those of a second-term Pres. Obama.
It's why I'm voting for a plurality by voting for third party.
I have no idea what you're talking about with this "voting for a plurality" stuff. I don't think it makes any sense, yet you seem quite fixated with the idea. Nobody else seems to be picking up on it. You might want to reconsider the whole concept.