Heinrich Himmler would be a lesser evil in this cycle. His malevolent genocide was aimed at a smaller segment of humanity and he actually brought some measure of military experience. I wouldn’t vote for him either.
There is a difference between imperfect and inadequate, and actively malevolent.
re: “Heinrich Himmler would be a lesser evil in this cycle. His malevolent genocide was aimed at a smaller segment of humanity and he actually brought some measure of military experience. I wouldn’t vote for him either.”
So you really think Romney is worse than Himmler? I don’t even know what to say to that. Romney is practicing and advocating malevolent genocide? I get the pro-choice thing making him complicit in abortion, but genocide?
The point is the race is between Obama - total 110% pro-abortion (even to killing babies who survive abortion) - and Romney - who is maybe 40% pro-abortion. Not good, but better than 110%
Obama is for total governmental control of business at worst and crony capitalism at best - total union - tax all Americans up the Wazoo - no business experience at all nor even concerned about economics that promote business (it’s irrelevant to him). Obama loves abortion, he loves preferential minority treatment, he hates capitalism, he hates Christianity, he has no regard for personal property rights, 2nd amendment rights, freedom of religion, plus, on top of all that he hates the United States of American and everything upon which it was founded.
That is not Romney. He wasn’t the guy I wanted, but that’s our choices. How can anyone not vote for him - at least we have a marginal chance at survival. With Obama there is no chance - with Romney a chance. Who do I vote for?? It’s a no-brainer.
Yes, Romney is supposed to be a Mormon. And, yes, Mormonism is a not an orthodox Christian denomination - it is regarded as a cult by orthodox Christians. But, do you really think Romney is out to turn the United States into a Mormon theocracy?? That would be some trick. We can barely even talk about God in public let alone establish a religious theocracy of any religious group (other than global warmists).
I see our country as an airliner whose pilot is either drunk or dead and we’re going down fast. If no one else on the plane can fly the plane but this one guy - would you care what religion he was or whether you agreed with him on every political subject? I doubt it. You would just want him to fly that plane straight and level and try to get it out of trouble. Sure, it may still go down, but if you are on that plane you want it to stay safely in the air as long as possible - you want to survive as long as you can because the alternative is death.
I don’t have to tell anyone here on this site what danger our nation is in. We all know we are in serious, serious trouble. If the only choices are (a) 100% awful, no chance of survival, and (b) 50% awful, some chance of survival - we go with less evil, more good than the other, more chance of survival.
If, on the other hand, you want to sit on your principles at and feel superior you didn’t “fall” for voting for less evil thing - great. Have at it.
P.S. Himmler was hardly a military expert. He was in training (boot-camp) when WW1 ended. He never saw combat at all. He was simply a Nazi political hack who believed in wacko “super-race” eugenics.