Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: JRandomFreeper

The aboitic claim is it is formed far deeper than the sedimentary layers.

It is just frustrating to me to see this nonsense posted over and over at Free Republic. It makes us look like fools.


49 posted on 06/04/2012 3:46:28 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: thackney
So complex hydrocarbons are always biotic? 'Splain me Titan.

I don't mind looking a fool, I've done that more than once. I want the truth of the matter.

/johnny

50 posted on 06/04/2012 3:52:57 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

I am sorry about the definition I gave. That was the OLD definition and I often slip into that mode.

The new term (and more accurate definition/description) is aerobic AND anaerobic - not biotic and abiotic.

Science changes definitions from time to time and I got stuck in the 1960’s in my descriptions.

Sorry Bout dat.

My bad. (circa 2010 lingo)


82 posted on 06/06/2012 11:30:18 AM PDT by jongaltsr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

I am sorry about the definition I gave. That was the OLD definition and I often slip into that mode.

The new term (and more accurate definition/description) is aerobic AND anaerobic - not biotic and abiotic.

Science changes definitions from time to time and I got stuck in the 1960’s in my descriptions.

Sorry Bout dat.

My bad. (circa 2010 lingo)


83 posted on 06/06/2012 11:31:34 AM PDT by jongaltsr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson