Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: central_va
Anyone who has studied statistics, probability and higher level mathematics, which I have, cannot take the theory of evolution seriously.


That's what I've been saying. Evolution/evoloserism is basically not compatible with modern mathematics, probability theory, information theory or anything like that at all.

In fact no real science theory would survive five years worth of the history of disproofs which is involved in the theory of evolution. Evolution survives on pure inertia and quasi-religious belief.

116 posted on 05/28/2012 7:09:47 AM PDT by varmintman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]


To: varmintman; exDemMom

Lets look at this human species graph from a mathematical perspective. At the tail end we have genus homo, showing h.erectus and h.heidlebeurgenus ending and h.neandertal and h.sapiens "suddenly appearing" in a short period of time. I have no problem with this. What I do have a problem with is trying to explain this as being caused by natural selection. No cross over species have been found, it is a step function by their own admission all are independent separate species. This is laughable on face value. Believe me, if any cross over species had been found it would have been MAJOR news.

No probability that a mutation occurred in a few thousand years that changed h.erectus into h.sapiens. No linear progression, are evos blind they will not see?

117 posted on 05/28/2012 7:27:57 AM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]

To: All
The big problem along these lines which politicians face at present is how to deal with the Chris Mathewses of the world...

The basic act goes like this: Mathews, an evil scowl on his face, appears on television and in a stern voice asks:

"Are you actually enough of a ****4brains, inbred, triple-chromosome dufeless ******-****** that YOU don't believe in evolution?? ANSWER ME!!!! Yes or no??"

And the poor politician, who has never made enough of a study of this sort of thing to have any sort of a good answer ready to hand just sort of sits there with a sort of a cowed look on his face:

"Well, uh, gee Mr. Mathews, if you say so..."

Here's the right answer and the answer which he need to TEACH our own pols:

[laughter...] "You know, that's really a sort of a cute act you have there Mr. Mathews, but it kind of indicates that your own education in science topics must have stopped somewhere before 1970...

Are you aware of the abject failure of the fruit fly experiments which were designed to prove macroevolution or that prominent scientists had denounced evolution because of those experiments? Do you even understand the difference between microevolution and macroevolution?

Are you aware of the concept of irreducible complexity and the problem that presents for evolutionists?

Are you aware of the extent of the analogy between RNA/DNA cell biology and modern computers and information theory? Have you read Dr. Don Johnson's "Programming of Life"?

Are you aware that evolution requires an infinite series of probabilistic miracles and outright zero probability events, and belief in things happening despite probabilities which look like one divided by a number which looks like one folloowed by tens of thousands of zeros ?

Are you aware of the Haldane dilemma and the impossible amounts of time it takes to spread ANY sort of a genetic change entirely through some species of animals? Are you also aware of the fact that researchers are finding proteins and soft tissue in dinosaur remains, strongly indicating that those animals died a few thousand or at most a few tens of thousands of years ago?

Are you aware that in our present internet age, nobody can hide that sort of information any more or bury it any more?

Are you aware that growing numbers of Americans can now see through this little scowling act of yours, and that the act itself makes you look like an ignoramus??

It might also help if every GOP pol had a copy of Don Johnson's book in his pocket:

and could speak on the subject when the Mathews inquisition comes up.

122 posted on 05/28/2012 7:51:27 AM PDT by varmintman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]

To: varmintman
In fact no real science theory would survive five years worth of the history of disproofs which is involved in the theory of evolution. Evolution survives on pure inertia and quasi-religious belief.

What, exactly, are these "disproofs"? As far as I can tell, the theory of evolution is still the unifying theory of biology--so far, no one has provided any evidence that it isn't.

132 posted on 05/28/2012 8:39:02 AM PDT by exDemMom (Now that I've finally accepted that I'm living a bad hair life, I'm more at peace with the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson