Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: fortheDeclaration
Very interesting, but there is one minor problem with you article.

Its wrong. You can choose what info is shared by how you enter and then set your permissions. No Date on the Article but being they are talking about 350 Million Accounts tells us its several years old.

And once again, your wrong. hahahaha

154 posted on 06/05/2012 3:39:44 AM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]


To: Mad Dawgg

January 11, 2010 10:24 AM

By pushing your personal information and conversation through activity updates fully into the public, Facebook is eliminating any integrity of context that these conversations would naturally have. Posted updates can be directed only to limited lists of Facebook contacts, like college buddies or work friends, but that option is buried under more public default options and much of a user’s activity on the site is not subject to that kind of option.

http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_facebook_is_wrong_about_privacy.php


156 posted on 06/05/2012 3:42:44 AM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]

To: Mad Dawgg
January 9, 2010 01:25 PM /

Had you looked you could see the actual date.

The fact is that privacy issues on FB are a real concerns to people who can think.

So once again, it is you who is wrong.

157 posted on 06/05/2012 3:45:24 AM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson