Irrelevant argument. The post of Altariel's to which you were responding was predicated on them being banned (go back and read it again), and therefore your response should be assumed to be based on that as well.
I answered accordingly....firearms to date are Not banned....the statement was “if” they were....should that one day be the case then the equation changes...and each will risk the outcome by concealing them of “storm troopers” crashing down their doors. It is how it is done now. Obviously so, you break the laws the consequences will and do come...and the risk with it.
As said before...I understand the arguements for our right to defend our homes and familys under the constitution....but this situation was and is not a constitutional issue...it was a drug bust...and that is how it’s done regardless if we like it or not.
I answered accordingly....firearms to date are Not banned....the statement was “if” they were....should that one day be the case then the equation changes...and each will risk the outcome by concealing them of “storm troopers” crashing down their doors. It is how it is done now. Obviously so, you break the laws the consequences will and do come...and the risk with it.
As said before...I understand the arguements for our right to defend our homes and familys under the constitution....but this situation was and is not a constitutional issue...it was a drug bust...and that is how it’s done regardless if we like it or not.