Are you aware that electoral data are generally dynamic, not static and things can change?
Romney not my first choice, but he will win in a landlside. Gay marriage was the final nail
“Are you aware that electoral data are generally dynamic, not static and things can change?”
Then that explanation makes Rove sound even more inept. If he’s such a statistical electoral analyst - which he prides himself and sells himself to be - then he’s even more ridiculous to go on the record and utter any such proclamations to begin with. If the numbers are that malleable and flexible as you claim (which I don’t necessarily agree with), then if Rove doesn’t know that he’s an idiot. If he does know that and goes on the air and blabbers on about what an election result will bring today, which was different from he claimed yesterday it would bring (giving his profession all the certainty of a long range weather forecast) then it makes my point even more lucidly. Why should anyone listen to a single word he says? If today’s info is no more accurate a barometer of assessing what will happen tomorrow - why utter it, other than for reasons of pure vanity? How does it help his reputation by doing so if all of this is in the flux state you claim??? He’s a buffoon - but if what you say is true, then he’s a buffoon to an exponential power.