[Sudetenland]

I didn't mention the GC, because--as its name implies--it is a CONSTANT, not a variable. Therefore, as I previously and accurately stated, "Gravity is solely a function of mass."

There is absolutely no evidence of even the possibility that there has been any change to the gravitational constant, past, present, or future. To speculate such is an empty, meaningless venture into the world of imagination, not science.

Hey, maybe the speed of light will change and become attainable--an equally valid and imaginary speculation.

[Boogieman]

“To speculate such is an empty, meaningless venture into the world of imagination, not science.”

Ha! That’s a good one. If someone speculated on such “meaningingless ventures”, and was able to come up with a demonstrable theory based on those speculations, we’d hail him after the fact as a visionary. Of course, until that success is achieved, we only get the poo-pooing of the forces of orthodoxy.

[Staten-John]

Not quite. Gravity is a function of mass and distance. Surface gravity on the Earth has varied over hundreds of millions of years. The reason has nothing to do with accretion of mass on the Earth’s surface but the movement of the Earth’s core elements (inner/outer cores and the densest part of the lower mantle.

A PDF summary of ‘The Gravity Theory of Mass Extinction’ can be found at www.dinoextinct.com