Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: GeronL
Civilization is a compromise between two extremes: absolute individualism and absolute collectivism. Too much of the former and you have anarchy; the society is weaker because you lose the economies of scale and the "multiplier effect" of groups working in unison. Too much of the latter and you have socialism, which punishes the productive and rewards those who weaken society; ultimately, even the productive give up and the society crumbles because no one is willing to work at all.

Capitalism -- the free market -- is the best compromise. It allows the individual to earn to his maximum potential and his survival is measured by his value to the collective. So it takes the best of both worlds while discarding the worst.

5 posted on 05/15/2012 4:29:32 PM PDT by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: IronJack

I think this is how morality might have “evolved”. Those things that benefitted humankind were seen as ‘moral’ and those than hurt mankind were ‘immoral’.

As I said, our nature is immoral. Fighting that basic nature is what brings civilization. Civilized in moral terms. Civilization in technological/physical terms is exactly as how you described.


9 posted on 05/15/2012 4:41:33 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson