Where have I insulted YOU? Meanwhile, you started with me.
I don’t like the “raw” opinion, indeed; I think it’s foolhardy. But I didn’t insult you personally.
I’ve seen alot of stuff about quackery. If you are neither a nutritionist nor veterinarian nor doctor, I doubt you are much more informed than I. “Raw” falls under the whole hippie “organic” (which in science, means “living”, and that’s all), “whole”, “natural” (hemlock is natural) foolishness for me.
I don’t argue with “human food” - I argue with raw. Why can’t the dogs have cooked food?
Rebel, you are free to feed your dogs any way you want to - but, if you leave them alone to hunt for their food, as dogs can do...
Notice what they eat first, then next, and notice what they leave.
but please let me know when you see them building a fire to cook whatever prey they have managed to take down.
I say again, feed your dogs whatever you want. I do not have to pay your vet bills, and while I feel sorry for your dogs, it is none of my business.
I offered my opinion, based on over 65 years of living with, training, and feeding a variety of breeds.
And, you have no right to insult my years of experience, my opinion, and my observations of what keeps a dog energetic, healthy, and happy.
“Hippie”? I am the farthest one can get from that ad-hominem cheap shot. I was raised on a good farm, back in the day, and know much more about animal husbandry than you could even imagine.
But, you are correct. I am not credentialed in any of the professions you find trustworthy. So be it. Disregard my opinion. I have no problem with that.
To each his own, ok?