Except you didn't. You spouted irrelevant gibberish and then essentially repeated your original point. Though at first you said all these conservatives were suppressing reason, now apparently they are just suspending it:
In the purest sense, any conservative who votes for Romney has suspended reason.
You are aggressively advocating something that all these people I mentioned completely oppose. What is it that you believe qualifies you to know better than Palin, Cheney, Rush, Levin, Hannity, Perry, Newt, etc, etc, etc, about how to cast our presidential ballots? You think all those intelligent conservative leaders have "suspended reason". Has it occurred to you that maybe you are just wrong? That, at minimum, most conservative leaders simply disagree with you - and that perhaps this attitude you have towards everyone who plans to vote for Willard as a means of getting rid of Hussein is misplaced.
The people you mentioned stated at the outset they would support whom ever the Republican nominee would be, that is for them to decide.
Who cares that they stated they were ABO from the outset. They said that because they believe that. What's that got to do with anything? They ALL still completely and utterly disagree with you. Stop acting all high and mighty and maybe consider you might not have all the answers. Of course everyone will make their own decision, but suggesting constitutional scholars like Mark Levin have "suspended reason" is just silly. Romney sucks, but most conservatives are going to vote for him because it is the only means of ejecting Hussein. I certainly understand that some people here feel differently, but the idea that all these conservative leaders are suppressing or suspending reason is ridiculous.
Just because you couldn’t understand what I wrote doesn’t mean its gibberish, it just means you didn’t get it.