Posted on 04/28/2012 10:25:22 AM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
Barack Obama had some advice for the single men of America today - seek out a woman with good genes, and then marry her.
The President set an example by sharing a kiss with his beautiful wife Michelle, minutes before praising her to the cheering and laughing crowd.
The First Lady, introducing her husband, told the Third Infantry Division Headquarters that the president had tirelessly fought for them.
'And, ladies, I think he's kinda cute,' she added to approving hurrahs from women in the crowd.
'She is a tough act to follow,' Obama said moments later.
'For the gentlemen out there who are not yet married, let me just explain to you: Your goal is to improve your gene pool by marrying somebody who is superior to you.' The crowd laughed.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
said the shit to the fly ?
shit + fly == better genes then shit alone.
check
That’s a lie??
So how is getting married, and procreating with a Wookie making the gene pool better?
Well no.
“Obama is a Communist”.
It is however, nevertheless effective if repeated often.
“Obama is a Communist”.
The racist Obama explaining his mother’s choice in a mate.
Well, if you read some older female authors, such as Jane Austen and Emily Bronte, you’ll find that the act of marrying up for money and status is common, either way. In Sense and Sensibilities, the ladies-man Willaby frequently seduces young women in order to bed them and dumps them, but when he finally gets married, he marries an extremely wealthy woman. Clearly, he married for money.
Conversely, women were pressured and advised to marry up, regardless, to the point where Jane Austen describes a mother’s sole purpose in life to marry her daughters to wealthy men.
Marrying for money is pretty much fair game across the board. The only reason its associated more with women is because at one point, it was the only way women could have anything (while Austen wrote women were not permitted to own property).
In general though, your statement about position and status is true in today’s society. I wouldn’t go so far as to say ‘never,’ though.
I’m surprised The Won would acknowledge that anyone was superior to him.
LOL!
And here I was thinking hippopotamuses...
Depends on what your definition of "beatiful" and "stylish" is.
Six ax-handles wide?
Someplace that's beautiful, I suppose.
That’s what I did. Worked pretty well for me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.