To: BIGLOOK
Think of all the possible steps one would need to go through to be able to demand a DNA test...and the complicated method needed to be employed to guarantee provenance of the sample...now compare that with the simple issue of asking for a genuine, provenanced long form birth certificate, and what HOPE would one have?
You’ve got a dog without a pedigree in the WH and you don’t know his birth name.
137 posted on
04/26/2012 6:16:17 PM PDT by
Fred Nerks
(fair dinkum!)
To: Fred Nerks
Youve got a dog without a pedigree in the WH and you dont know his birth name.
And I would contend we do not know his birth date too. Reviewing everything and discovering all the documentation to be false, reviewing all the photos and finding that the bulk of them have been doctored and the absence of all school records would make a normally thoughtful person just crumple them all up and file them in the round file.
Of his declared Kenyan relatives that are still living, a simple blood sample could confirm a blood line....or deny one. One other source that could prove his actual relationship to the Dunhams would be his half sister, Maya Soetoro Ng or that could also disprove it.
I don't recall anything on after birthing checkups by Stanley Ann or the baby (which at the time would have been performed at the hospital of birth or conveniently at the Kapi'olani Clinic for Women and Children it makes me suspect in the actual relationship to the Dunhams. Such wouldn't require an awful lot of documented information ...just whatever the patient filled out on a form when making an appointment.
141 posted on
04/26/2012 6:58:54 PM PDT by
BIGLOOK
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson