Well it’s obvious that the officer was in fear of his life and needed to shoot the dog to protect himself from mortal danger. He probably should have shot the homeowner too, just to be sure.
/FR bootlicks
“Well it’s obvious that the officer was in fear of his life and needed to shoot the dog to protect himself from mortal danger. He probably should have shot the homeowner too, just to be sure.”
Default shooting of the dog AND homeowner or resident(s) will become SOP in the not-so-distant future.
Heh, the FR bootlicker brigade won’t show up on this thread. They’ll be whining to each other deep down on some off-topic thread or hiding out in Bloggers and Personal.