Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Former MSM Viewer

One agent didn’t want to pay the hotel a fee for a “guest” so Obama sends the whole lot of them packing home?

No I think his handlers made a suggestion to clean his house, that one or more of the agents were spying and reporting on Obamas activities and thus had to be removed immediately.

Thus why the urgency to replace the rolling cocoon of security? I think its because Obama is about to do something he does NOT want America to know about.

The house of Obama is a smoke filled room full of twisted and distorted mirrors, doors with passages to nowhere and booby trapped floors.


30 posted on 04/14/2012 9:21:55 AM PDT by Eye of Unk (Liberals need not reply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Eye of Unk
Thus why the urgency to replace the rolling cocoon of security? I think its because Obama is about to do something he does NOT want America to know about.

One has to hope that at least one of the twelve will now report on what is going on. I also agree that the new black panther party will replace the Secret Service on the POTUS detail soon.

51 posted on 04/14/2012 10:50:41 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Mormon missionaries are Christianophobe bigots denigrating Christian faiths.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: Eye of Unk
Thus why the urgency to replace the rolling cocoon of security? I think its because Obama is about to do something he does NOT want America to know about.

To clarify, this was an outlying hotel that was secured by part of the advance team. The team likely consisted of two agents and ten officers, who are not part of the personal protection detail and were never near Obama to 'spy' on him. They were protecting one of the brat pack hotels where the lower echelon drones stay - from people who work for the Department of State to Commerce.

IF this was personal protection AND the hotel where Obama was staying, you might be right. But these are third stringer bench warmers who screwed up and let someone into a secure area, and likely didn't log it. That means everyone gets on a plane and goes back home to get interviewed about the breach, because this is how the SS operates. That it's also been announced as a referral to internal affairs means that this is more than just about a hooker (a code of conduct issue dealt with by supervisors) to an actual breach of security and a cover up.

The cover up simply could have been falsifying the security log by not recording the hooker's real identity, or worse, not logging her in and out at all. That, the SS takes EXTREMELY seriously.

55 posted on 04/14/2012 12:33:50 PM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson