Your analogy is fine but where there is a slight amount of evidence or, the prosecutor feels he can make a case agains’t someone having only minimal evidence, they WILL use exageration to get the idea across (plant the seed so to speak). I’ve seen it done and it DOES WORK, no matter what you or I believe to be fair. Zimmerman MUST HAVE a good lawyer if he expects to get off and from what I read, I agree with you. Hope it works in his favor.
it may ‘work’ however, it is still an injustice- where htere is no evidence, someone shouldn’t ethically be allowed to just say that there is ‘minimal evidence’- Again, We’re suppsoed to be protected against such things- because if we’re not, then anyoen at any time can level any charges they klike against us and claim there is ‘minimal evidence’ to support the charges.
I realize lawyers do infact do this all the time- however, we are suppsoed to be protected agasinst such miscarriages of justice, but over hte years, leberal judges have allowed prosecutors to get away with such travestiesw of justice tiem and tiem again until now it has becoem standard practice to thwart constitutional and civil rights