Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

You sound like a pessimist. Every state you mention, you cede it to Obama. It’s as if you think that Obama will win all 57 states.


4 posted on 04/03/2012 4:30:19 PM PDT by SamAdams76 (I am 37 days away from outliving Phil Hartman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SamAdams76

Ed Rollins seems to think its Romney’s intent to cede those states to Obama. He said that he can afford to spend the money he spent on Michigan because he won’t be spending it here during the general election.


8 posted on 04/03/2012 4:36:37 PM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: SamAdams76; All

57 states. LOL. Classic. Don’t forget Obama’s boneheaded “Austrian language” and “breathalyzer” comments.

Now to the rest...

No, not pessimism. I speak reality into this.

Look at 2000 and 2004.

Romney is no Reagan who came close to sweeping the nation.

Pool after poll shows those bluest of blue states are too far out of reach for Romney - even with the bad economy and Obama at the helm.

Do you honestly think that Romney can win Illinois? Illinois? Puhleeze. Or New York or Maryland even?

Come on, be realistic.


9 posted on 04/03/2012 4:38:38 PM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson