LOL. You're ridiculous. Nothing I have posted is even remotely like "hyping flying saucers". And if CF pans out as the latest data indicates, it will be the biggest scientific discovery since fire. But I guess you haven't bothered to look at Celani's talk at CERN, have you.
"My point is that the cold fusion postings are grossly disproportionate to their scientific or commercial importance. They also sink to the level of promoting scams and making conservatives look bad, which is why challenging them is more important than making you and Kevmo happy.
EVERYTHING that I have posted refers back to the best available data, INCLUDING the items about Rossi. Your only purpose is to stifle ANY positive discussion on LANR. Note that this thread has nothing to do with Rossi, and certainly can't be taken as "promoting scams".
And I fail to see how pointing people to where they can look at the facts themselves can possibly "make conservatives look bad".
"We also haven't read all the papers on the Loch Ness monster or flying saucers. If an award winner like yourself can't make the case for cold fusion based on the papers, why should we waste our time?
I've referred you to LENR-CANR repeatedly. I have no idea which sources you might have access to, or which journal(s) you accept as having the best peer-review.
"By peer you mean members of the cold fusion mutual admiration society. And sites like LENR-CANR were set up to publish all the cold fusion hype that respectable scientific journals won't publish. It's only one step up from Rossi's fake "peer reviewed" journal.
Which statement tells me that you have never examined the contents of the LENR-CANR library section. There are plenty of peer-reviewed journals cited there. They are specifically identified as such. And LENR-CANR "also" contains negative papers.
I'll make a guess....the only journals you and "Nifster" will accept as "adequate" are those that refuse to accept CF papers. Talk about "Catch-22".
You say this on a thread you posted, based on an article from a blog dedicated to the scammer and convict, Andrea Rossi.
And if CF pans out as the latest data indicates, it will be the biggest scientific discovery since fire.
So would flying saucers with all their wonderful alien technology.
But I guess you haven't bothered to look at Celani's talk at CERN, have you.
That's part of a lecture series designed to entertain the janitors and secretaries who work at CERN. Why should I read it? Once again you are placing the burden of proving or disproving cold fusion on the people you are trying to convince, rather than using your own award winning talent to make the case. It's rather devious of you.
That's like referring to the best avilable fish head in a bucket of chum.
Your only purpose is to stifle ANY positive discussion on LANR.
Not at all. It took very little to convince me that muon catalyzed cold fusion is real or that high school students created hot fusion in their garages. That's because the quality of data is so good and convincing. The stuff you post is hype and emphasizes quantity, rather than quality.
Note that this thread has nothing to do with Rossi, and certainly can't be taken as "promoting scams".
Note that the article you posted is copied from a blog called E-Cat World. E-Cat being Rossi's latest scam. The article also mentions Rossi.
Which statement tells me that you have never examined the contents of the LENR-CANR library section. There are plenty of peer-reviewed journals cited there. They are specifically identified as such. And LENR-CANR "also" contains negative papers.
I went over to LENR-CANR.org to find its peer review process. I couldn't find it. What I did find is that LENR-CANR.org is a Wordpress blog on cold fusion run by Jed Rothwell. So I was wrong, LENR-CANR.org is no better than Rossi's fake journal blog.
And since you are so big on credentials, what kind of credentials does Jed Rothwell have?
A "journal" that's something more than a blog would be a start, which would be a monumental leap in your case.