[Moonman62]

But you've read every paper published on cold fusion....NOT With every comment here, you are proving that you have NOT done that.

We also haven't read all the papers on the Loch Ness monster or flying saucers. If an award winner like yourself can't make the case for cold fusion based on the papers, why should we waste our time?

In peer reviewed publications, of course. Many of these can be accessed through LENR-CANR.org.

By peer you mean members of the cold fusion mutual admiration society. And sites like LENR-CANR were set up to publish all the cold fusion hype that respectable scientific journals won't publish. It's only one step up from Rossi's fake "peer reviewed" journal.

[Nifster]

Thanks Moonman62. I forget that sometimes it hopeless to try and argue with the irrational.....

I almost got the feeling that it was like listening to Richard Hoagland explain his wonderful theories on 19.5 and NASA etc etc et