So I should disregard the large section of the article that comes under the heading: Miley's Distinguished History?
Krivit tries to help Miley out of his jam:
On Dec. 3, in the absence of a chance to learn from Miley directly in a phone call, I began looking at his slides. I saw some things that seemed to explain the discrepancy. I sent Miley another inquiry.And then Krivit is actually being generous by allowing Miley to claim 8 watts, when the slides indicate that it was only 2 watts.I asked him, "When you said, 'At the moment, we can run continuously at levels of a few hundred watts,' did you omit to state at the end of that sentence 'per kilogram of material'? In other words, would it have been more correct to say, 'At the moment, we can run continuously at levels of a few hundred watts per kilogram of material'"?
Finally Krivit allows one last excuse:
"I think that George has found a mistake in his grad student's work," Cravens wrote. "She was rushing due to the baby delivery."Instead of a "crusade to pillory" Krivit is doing everything possible to help out yet another scientist who has turned into a cold fusion clown.
LOL. You are SUCH a hypocrite. Krivits maunderings are gospel when they agree with your position, but are to be disregarded when they refer to multiple replications OF THE SAME SORT OF WORK.
Apparently, your only standard of judgment is "agrees with me". Sorry, buddy. That ain't science, it's propaganda.