A few days is believable, but over 20 years isn't.
Guys like you work very hard to inflict that reputation, as you continue to do here. You are simply grossly intellectual dishonest, and a waste of time.
I'm the one who wants to cut the hype and the scams, yet I'm the one who's dishonest and wasting time. I can make a better case for LENR than you.
You must never have gotten a patent (or failed to get one). If what you think was true, no patents would be issued, because everything unique would have "already been invented".
The tokamak boys are running up on half a century, and have yet to deliver. The inertial confinement guys have a better track record...just about the equal of cold fusion. But in the two former instances, untold billions of dollars have been spent to reach the current level of technology. The cold fusion work has been FAR more "economically efficient" by several orders of magnitude
"I'm the one who wants to cut the hype and the scams, yet I'm the one who's dishonest and wasting time.
So, all the hundreds of research papers referenced in the Storms review article are "hype and scams"?? And the much larger bibliography in his book are all equally "hype and scams" also??.
In that case, precisely what would constitute "proof" for you that cold fusion was real??
"I can make a better case for LENR than you."
LOL. You haven't even made a good case "against" cold fusion.