You really should actually click through and look at the actual data, rather than just reading the URL's and assuming "blog entries". The first link is to a preprint of a scientific review of the field of cold fusion by Storms that was published in Naturwissenshaften. The second link is to a similar but older review, also published. The third is a summary of Storm's own work at LANL. The fourth is to a "student guide" to Cold Fusion. The fifth is an update to the "student guide". ALL of those links have extensive references to actual published science. The last link is to the actual Naturwissenschaften article that was published.
But once again, you just "can't be bothered" to actually look at the evidence.
"If you would drop the hype and reliance on the attention given to frauds and scams, you could make a pretty good case for temperature anomalies as others have done, but not for fusion. Nobody has done that."
Sorry, but wrong. Quite a few studies have shown beyond any reasonable doubt, that the Pd/D system produces He4, and that the production of He4 is proportional to the excess heat generated. That certainly looks like "fusion" to me. References to those studies are found in the links posted. The Ni-H system is more of a mystery as to what the mechanism is.
Which studies? How about some excerpts or specific references? One quality reference is worth more than the hundreds of claims you make.
That certainly looks like "fusion" to me.
The human body produces more heat, pound for pound, than the Sun. That looks like fusion too, but it isn't. From what I've read, most of the cold fusion crowd is no longer claiming fusion either.