Why is it that common employees at NASA were able to think of this "supremely simple" experiment within a few months of the Fleischmann and Pons announcement, yet no one else in the world has thought of it in the 20+ years since?
And I suspect that now that the “palladium purifier” approach has become somewhat more widely known, that many individuals and groups will try it.
It's been almost 3 years since the 2009 memo. Yawn and snore.
What you actually mean is “Moonman62” refuses to look at the evidence. Here’s a clue....you sticking your fingers in your ears and saying “I can’t hear you” doesn’t make the evidence go away.
If you go back and look at this thread, you'll see that I'm the only one listening to your so called evidence, and making the effort to turn it into something comprehensible. You should be more appreciative.
http://www.infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue1/colfusthe.html
Try this link. I think this particular victim of the fact of suppression is sufficiently credible.
It felt so strange going to an online magazine called Infinite Energy to read a rant given by someone who was dead at the time. Anyway, it's a shame he couldn't get to the point in 200 words or less and say his theory was cold fusion was caused by deuterium reacting with hydrogen contamination. Even someone who is as stupid as me (for listening to you) can think of an easy test. Repeat the "supremely simple" NASA experiment, and introduce varying amounts of hydrogen gas into the deuterium to see what effect it has on the brief temperature anomaly, and look for the Helium 3 product.
I expect my share of the Nobel prize for suggesting it.
Good question. Perhaps the fact that it was never published or publicized widely has something to do with it.
"It's been almost 3 years since the 2009 memo. Yawn and snore.
Again a case of failure to publicize. Why is that?
"If you go back and look at this thread, you'll see that I'm the only one listening to your so called evidence, and making the effort to turn it into something comprehensible. You should be more appreciative.
Oh, I suspect there are some lurkers out there as well.
"It felt so strange going to an online magazine called Infinite Energy to read a rant given by someone who was dead at the time. Anyway, it's a shame he couldn't get to the point in 200 words or less and say his theory was cold fusion was caused by deuterium reacting with hydrogen contamination.
So, a Nobel Laureate and expert in quantum solid state physics tries to publish theory papers on cold fusion, is stifled, presents the evidence for being stifled, and all you see is "a dead guy" who was only talking about deuterium reacting with hydrogen.
See my previous point about your lack of intellectual honesty.
"Even someone who is as stupid as me (for listening to you) can think of an easy test. Repeat the "supremely simple" NASA experiment, and introduce varying amounts of hydrogen gas into the deuterium to see what effect it has on the brief temperature anomaly, and look for the Helium 3 product."
WOW! What an exercise in post-facto logic. Perhaps if Scwhinger had known about the NASA experiment back in 1989, he would have fostered doing just that. But now that Celani HAS seen that the technique HAS been widely publicized, you can bet that the approach WILL be re-tested. It will be interesting to see if a "mainstream science" publication is willing to then publish the results.