Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: moonhawk

I repeat, he would not have attacked unless his intentions were criminal.
.


368 posted on 03/25/2012 6:39:22 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 366 | View Replies ]


To: editor-surveyor

I repeat, he would not have attacked unless his intentions were criminal.


17 year old boys of any race are not exactly well known for their impulse control. Could be a verbal confrontation that just got out of hand. Have seen some speculation on that in another thread, and we’ve all seen it happen first hand.

Either way, I’ll wait for the investigation and have a look at the Friday news dump to see why this month old story has suddenly blanketed the news.


378 posted on 03/25/2012 8:32:42 PM PDT by EnglishCon (Gingrich/Santorum 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 368 | View Replies ]

To: editor-surveyor

Look, I tend to believe Zimmerman, but we have Martin thinking he was being followed by someone, and not knowing who that person was. He may have thought he was in danger. (The guy was hispanic, after all—irony intended).

At any rate, I’ve seen no evidence presented by you or anyone that Martin set out to do harm to anybody, anymore than Zimmerman did.

And speculation on both sides is just what the enemy—Obama__ wants.


386 posted on 03/25/2012 9:47:58 PM PDT by moonhawk (Rush, Mark, Sean: Conservative talkers. Sarah, Newt: Conservative DOers. Mitt: Conservative faker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 368 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson