“Archaeology just ignores India. Indian archaeologists insist that humans go back at least a million years.”
I’m not sure what you’re driving at here (hey, no pun intended!)
Could you elucidate a little more?
How long do “western” scientists say humans go back, for one thing?
(I know they are mostly atheistic communists, I know that part already!)
During the ice age, much of northern Europe and Asia, including the Himalyas, and North America were under sheets of ice.
The warmest places for humans was around the equator - present day India, much of Africa, the Amazon River Basin and southeast Asia. It is only now that those places are being explored for early human civilizations, and in the case of India and Indonesia, most of that will have to be via marine archaeology. The important stuff is underwater.
The problem with archaeology is it was birthed as a scientific endeavor during the 19th century in Europe, when everyone expected the first humans to look like modern Victorian ladies and gentlemen.
How long do “western” scientists say humans go back, for one thing?
—
If a western archaeologist makes a claim for Homo Sapiens Sapiens (modern man) older than 40,000 years, he treads dangerous academic grounds. This, despite DNA showing oldest female descent going back 250,000 years.
Would be nice to have a link about Indian archaeologists claims. Anyone? SunkenCiv?