Posted on 03/08/2012 6:44:09 AM PST by SlaveNoMore
The video “released” yesterday by FOX and Breitbart is NOT one of the videos for which Andrew Breitbart lost his life.
The video played yesterday was already available as it was part of a program aired by Frontline back in 2008. Proof.
There have to be other videos. Go back to Breitbart’s own statement that there are videos of Obama. This is not a slip of the tongue. He says videos, plural, multiple times.
He further states that, “Barack Obama met a bunch of silver-haired, ponytails back in the 1980s like Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn who, equally radical, said ‘one day we’re gonna have the presidency while the rest of us slept while they plotted, and they plotted and they plotted while they oversaw hundreds of millions of dollars through the Anenburg Challenge, and . . . they had real money.”
The video shown, not released, yesterday did not show silver-haired ponytails, nor was it new.
Just my observation. Your thoughts?
I’d say it’s going in the right direction. The focus is back on Barry. Left-wing media is now having to defend him.
—The focus is back on Barry. Left-wing media is now having to defend him.—
Good point.
The Democrat Media Complex.
—The Democrat Media Complex.—
I’m with you. The problem is that it plays well. Imagine you have never heard of Freerepublic and you read that article. What are you going to think? Who are you going to believe?
Breitbart is gonna need to turn up the heat or this is going nowhere.
Maybe so. But that doesn't sound like a strategy.
The difference now without Andrew: If they have lots of damning videos then they'd have to know of a "damning theme" or constant thread among them.
Rather than say "hey we got lots of magic tricks in our bag" Andrew would be saying "I have captured the real Barack Obama in this bag here, and I'm going to show you his teeth and how they will bite you."
They don't have a theme so far. So either they don't have much, or they do have good stuff and are not going to be able to release it to full effect.
Or maybe everything will turn out great.
Self satire is perfectly fine. But for anyone who might be confused about the term “nut job,” when taken literally it means crazy.
And the ultimate definition of crazy is this: that state of mind which causes one to believe false is true and true is false.
In other words, Saul Alinsky’s “first radical” is also the first nut job.
“I am not interested in anything Brietbart puts out any more.”
This statement is 100% irrational from a conservative.
At this point you are a cuban leaf in every respect, until proven otherwise.
His strategy is working like a charm! Their theme is the media covering for Obama even more than it is about Obama himself. It is a trap they are setting to vet the media as much as Obama. If you don’t believe me, google the Soledad Obrien/pollak interview about the video. Obrien was falling all over herslf trying to neutralize Pollak. She was laughable.
In fact, here it is...enjoy.(from an earlier post)
It all started here...
Thanks for the clarification. (For the sake of clarity, I only wanted to show who the real nut jobs are, even though it’s obvious to you and others.)
—This statement is 100% irrational from a conservative.—
Keep reading. I backed off that statement pretty quickly.
Probably the biggest weakness in FR is the inability to edit posts. I did not type what I meant. What I meant was to add the words, “until I actually see it”.
Malkin: We will NOT just shrug our shoulders at Obama’s radical connections
MALKIN:..This is news! They didn’t want to talk about it then and they don’t want to talk about it now. Do you think it’s a coincidence of timing that Barack Obama has now hired people to put out some 17-minute documentary?This is all about Alinskyite control of who tells the story. Well guess what Barack Obama and Jim Messina. It is not all your monopoly anymore and that’s why they are pushing back so hard. It is not ‘nothing’!
It is very crucial!
I'm going to be optimistic and take the 'high road' and hope they don't run this off into the ditch. Bannon said that AB had hired "fighters" .... and he referred directly to Pollak. I think we have to remind ourselves that there was only one AB & these guys, even if they do their best, will never be AB who was 'larger than life'. If they can accomplish even part of what AB had in mind, that will be a good thing.
If you think Breitbart was going to dump all his videos on March 1st, you didn’t know Breitbart.
Or maybe everything will turn out great.
Time will tell, Sam. In the meantime, I miss Andrew greatly... :-(
I think those were Weiner's final words.
Remember the Acorn pimp and prostitute bust on the media? It did not come out all at one time.
Derek Bell’s ideology has not been vetted yet. Remember Obama’s excuse when caught with Rev. Wright and the racial terrorists? Just a preacher - crazy uncle in the attic and the terrorists - just lived in my neighborhood. Now he is shown embracing Bell who is a major anti-white racist radical. Black racist Bell makes the terrorists look like patriots.
Big Govt wants to led this....Hannity elbow’d in so he got a taste....
Thanks for including me in this highly esteemed group.
thank you...his comments make no sense..he just posts without waiting for an answer!!
Bretibart always released them , each one more damaging than the last one.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.