Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv
archaeologists had believed him to be an imaginary king

This seems so strange to me. Just because evidence hadn't yet been found doesn't mean he didn't exist.

5 posted on 03/05/2012 6:51:32 PM PST by Rocky (REPEAL IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Rocky; SunkenCiv
This seems so strange to me.

Me too. I don't see the Egyptians just making up imaginary kings. And just how many imaginary Egyptian kings are there?

8 posted on 03/05/2012 7:04:06 PM PST by bigheadfred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Rocky; Parley Baer; bigheadfred; Outlaw Woman; Danae

And could they *see* their imaginary kings??? ;’)

Quirke’s book on the list of pharaohs includes only those names actually found on monuments, although he discusses some of the ephemeral kings. It’s little known, for example, that Khufu (of Great Pyramid fame) was succeeded by his son Djedjefre, who started his own pyramid a few miles north, at Abu Roash. Djedjefre apparently died young, and was succeeded by his own son, who was then supplanted by Khafre, builder of the second of the big pyramids at Giza. One of the granddaughters of Khufu had a pretty nice burial chamber of her own in the largely unmapped catacombs underlying the Giza plateau. In the carving she seems to have had no body image problems or self-esteem shortfalls.

The king lists which gave us the entire dynastic structure were compiled (and possibly invented, at least in part) by Manetho, an Egyptian who lived late in the New Kingdom era (the division into three “kingdoms”, grouping dynasties into three eras, with some grouped in “intermediate periods”, is a modern convention). His list survives in three slightly later variant and (overlapping) fragmentary forms.

Manetho gives the dynasties in sequential order, whereas it is known that a number of these dynasties (including 17) ran concurrent with others.

Egypt did *not* spend its entire history as one undivided state with a single ruler and capital, with beginnings 5000 years ago. A fair assessment yields the view that Egypt’s history consists of continual breakup, struggle, and reunification after periods of years or even generations and sometimes centuries. Even when there were no upstarts in this or that region, there were schisms in the ruling families, and those often resulted in the end of a dynasty.

The temple of Seti “the Great”, which was completed by his better-known son, Ramses II “the Great”, has a wall showing many generations of unbroken kingship back to Menes; a fair number of the kings in that list — including Menes himself — don’t appear on any other monuments anywhere. Ramses II, who was descended from his father (rather than female-line kingship) had lots of wives, lots of kids, and it’s not entirely unlikely that he’s the ancestor of 100s of millions of people today, including most of the population of modern Egypt.


13 posted on 03/05/2012 8:02:00 PM PST by SunkenCiv (FReep this FReepathon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson