[christianhomeschoolmommaof3]

No you didn’t argue against her points. The point is that she doesn’t have the right to ask a Catholic institution to provide her or anyone else with anything they don’t want to especially something that is against their religious convictions. I don’t care if she is a virgin or a nun and she wants Bible to hand out on campus, she doesn’t have the right to demand it from her school. So calling her slutty does nothing for your argument and actually detracts from it.

[TigersEye]

Yes, I did argue against her point. Her point being that it costs the average female law student $3k in contraception to get through law school. She said that. Her point being that the school insurer doesn't cover that. Her excuse was that some minor percentage use bc pills for medical conditions and that's a phoney excuse because they do cover that.

She made herself an advocate for women who need $3k in contraception to get through law school.

Fine, she's not a slut, she's merely a Slut Advocate. What does that make her?

[TigersEye]

So calling her slutty does nothing for your argument and actually detracts from it.

One woman's opinion. I disagree completely.