[Jim from C-Town]

It lowers and corsens the discussion. It is akin to calling your adversary a Nazi. It is also pure conjecture.

[DJ MacWoW]

I'll tell you what I told someone else.

I see by your sign up that you weren't here during Clinton. Your head would have exploded.

The reality is that we are being taken over by rich and powerful marxists (like Soros). And you want to pretend that they don't play rough. Or have access to things like this. You'd be wrong.

[ElayneJ]

“It lowers and corsens the discussion. It is akin to calling your adversary a Nazi. It is also pure conjecture.”

OK - That’s interesting. What is the discussion that’s being corsened? AB is dead. What discussion should we be having? I always find this kind of argument fascinating. Do you remember Vince Foster? There certainly were questions surrounding his death. Why would his friends, loved ones, and admirers be content with a park ranger’s report of cause of death? If my loved one died unexpectedly, I’d want to know every single thing I could about it. Why was that not the case for VF? Same here. If there’s anything amiss in AB’s death, why should we not want to know?

It’s akin to calling our opponents nazis? Seriously? Again, how?

[rawcatslyentist]

>"It is akin to calling your adversary a Nazi."

But our adversaries ARE Nationalistic Socialists.

[little jeremiah]

You don’t know the facts of the matter. You have no way of knowing. Naturally there are suspicious. We are in the middle of a takeover of our country by hardcore, merciless, lawless leftists. They spit on the rule of law and the Constitution.

You have no idea whether Breitbart died a natural death or was killed. Your comment about “lowering and coarsening the discussion” sounds like propaganda to me. Any normal conservative would think at least there’s a possibility of foul play. And that discussing it is not only perfectly sane but natural. You want to shut up the discussion and I don’t get that.