Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: skeeter

BTW Iran Contra wasn’t any kind of a crime.

Really? Selling arms to Iran is AOK? I had no idea. Aren’t they using them against us now? I don’t know much of this story but in the 80’s I remember hearing a bit (I was young). Didn’t Colonel North go to jail? Seriously didn’t hear much about it.


71 posted on 03/04/2012 9:24:56 AM PST by napscoordinator (A moral principled Christian with character is the frontrunner! Congrats Santorum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: napscoordinator

Didn’t Colonel North go to jail?

“North was charged with several felonies and convicted of three, but the convictions were later vacated, and the underlying charges dismissed due to the limited immunity agreement granted for his pre-trial public Congressional testimony about the affair.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oliver_North


78 posted on 03/04/2012 9:38:06 AM PST by Carriage Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: napscoordinator
Selling arms to Iran is AOK?

Maybe it was AOK, maybe not. But it wasn't a crime. The case the democrats tried to make was it was in violation of Reagan's 'do not deal with terrorist' policy.

Aren’t they using them against us now?

Surely not. We're talking about a few planeloads of now-old technology thirty years ago. Allegedly only enough to convince the 'friendly' iranian authorities North was dealing with that they were in fact dealing with decision makers in the US.

I don’t know much of this story but in the 80’s I remember hearing a bit (I was young). Didn’t Colonel North go to jail? Seriously didn’t hear much about it.

No he didn't. The 'crime' part of Iran Contra ws the violation of the so-called 'Boland Amendment' which was in effect for a short period of time, but I think North was nailed for misleading congress (always the only charge that stick in these 'scandals'). Many argue that this amendment itself represented an illegal impingment of executive authority.

Personally, I look at the intentions of the two different parts of the scandal - the selling of arms to supposed friendlies in Iran for the purpose of getting their help in the release of Americans held by terrorists in Lebanon, and with the proceeds the purchase and provision of arms for the counter revolutionaries fighting the marxist government in Nicaragua - and conclude that what the congress called a 'crime' was really the Reagan administration trying to conduct their stated foreign policy in spite of the political motivated interference of the democrat controlled congress.

135 posted on 03/04/2012 11:57:35 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson