Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: FightThePower!
Interesting the media was claiming his death was of natural causes before an autopsy was conducted.

Yep. Not "APPARENT natural causes", flat out natural causes...

13 posted on 03/04/2012 8:36:27 AM PST by null and void (Day 1138 of America's ObamaVacation from reality [Heroes aren't made, Frank, they're cornered...])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: null and void; SF_Redux; lightman

“APPARENT natural causes”

That phrase appeared in the very first articles, before it was even widely-confirmed that he’d died, IIRC. Something doesn’t pass the “smell test”, here.


59 posted on 03/04/2012 9:03:43 AM PST by Carriage Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

Breitbart had as many and as powerful enemies, as JFK.

Obviously every resource available out there, would be available to those powerful enemies with almost unlimited resources and knowledge of how such things can be done.

I don’t know one way or the other, whether Breitbart was killed, or suffered a terrible natural fate.

I don’t even know whether it is possible to induce a heart attack and make it look like a natural cause.

I do know, that if someone with the resources available to those who were Breitbart’s enemies was determined to kill him, they would know his personal history and know he would have been vulnerable to a coronary.

Being not only a weakness, but also the perfect cover. “He had a history of heart issue”.

The one think I do know, is I am more than a bit suspicious of the circumstances.

It’s a highly, highly unusual coincidence.


138 posted on 03/04/2012 12:04:38 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network ("The door is open" PALIN 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson