no, it’s called her viewpoint, and this is what urks me on some of these boards. From “birthers”, 911 truthers, Trig truthers and the lot, anyone who differs gets smack, called a nut, a cover up conspirator and so forth.
And your last post was waaaaay over the top. My eyes rolled on your rant that somehow she’s part of the plot to stop the medical examiner.
I guess the PJMedia board is part of it was well. Sheesh.
“And your last post was waaaaay over the top. My eyes rolled on your rant that somehow she’s part of the plot to stop the medical examiner.”
************************************************
Dude, I think you need to re-read my post. There’s no way I said there was some sort of plot to stop the medical examiner.
I was simply facetiously taking her “conspiracy theorist” argument to its logical conclusion that anyone who ever entertains the possibility of non-natural death (as all Coroners are CHARGED to do) is a conspiracy nut. The LA Coroner’s Office has a POLICY of automatically requiring the medical examiner to conduct an autopsy in the case of a young (and, yes, 43 is young) person dying UNEXPECTEDLY. The reason behind that policy is that, in such cases, the Coroner’s Office automatically assumes that there is the POSSIBILITY of foul play which must either be ruled out or determined. That is not because the Coroner’s Office is ruled by conspiracy theorists; it’s because they are ruled by responsible people WITH OPEN MINDS who are only too aware of the possibilities in such cases.