Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12

Santorum won state-wide twice running on a conservative platform in a deep blue state. A lot of Republicans got run out of office in 2006. Santorum had a thin margin of error in Pennsylvania, and he stood on principle, not like Newt, who firmly stakes out both sides of major issues.

You say Santorum sucks with women and catholics for actually adhearing to the teachings of the Church, but offer no proof, and then you trun around and say that Newt, a serial adulterer will appeal to catholic women. You must not think to highly of Catholic Women.

It doesn’t matter anyway, Newt could drain enough votes to force Santorum into a tie in Michigan, but Newt may not win another state other than Georgia. All Newt is doing is ensuring a Romney win and an Obama second term.

Newt should stick to what he does best, influence peddeling.


116 posted on 02/29/2012 11:04:57 PM PST by NavVet ("You Lie!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: NavVet
Rick Santorum help Trent Lott KILL the impeachment proceedings in the Senate, which kept that gutter snipe Clinton in office. He is the (out of his own mouth) a ‘team player’.

AND all the Catholic women I personally know are liberal and unless directed otherwise from on high will vote again for Obama. Liberals know this about many Catholic women, which is why they decided to make the funding of ‘birth control’ a political issue. Rick took their bait. Socialized medicine was old saint in waiting Teddy Kennedy's life work.... and Nancy the ‘red’ Pewlouise and Bart Stupak made socialized medicine a reality.

118 posted on 02/29/2012 11:10:44 PM PST by Just mythoughts (Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]

To: NavVet

Santorum was dumped from his Senate seat by 18 points, that was a freakish loss, other Republicans lost by 1 or 2 points in close races.

Santorum only won 39% of women and 42% of white Catholics in that race evicting him from the Senate.

What I said about Newt Gingrich is that he has had a coming to Christ moment, and converted to Catholicism, that is something that as the Republican nominee he can use to convert Catholic voters and Catholic Hispanics to vote Republican.

Santorum has never accomplished anything, or led anything, Gingrich took the Congress from the Democrats permanent clutches, and made history as a conservative leader and of the Reagan Revolution. Gingrich can destroy Obama in a head to head race, Santorum does not have what it takes to do any such thing.


121 posted on 02/29/2012 11:18:03 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]

To: NavVet

“Santorum won state-wide twice running on a conservative platform in a deep blue state. A lot of Republicans got run out of office in 2006. Santorum had a thin margin of error in Pennsylvania, and he stood on principle, not like Newt, who firmly stakes out both sides of major issues.”

Here is an example of Rick Santorum pitching his ability to be moderate and work with democrats in his 2006 race.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eCk3DMNpJIY


130 posted on 02/29/2012 11:38:57 PM PST by Apollo5600
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson