Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: VU4G10

The argument will be: many states’ citizens voted to CONTINUE WITH SLAVERY in their own states.

It was found unconstitutional. The gays will say the states that vote no on gay marriage are denying them of their rights... and as such, it is unconstitutional.

It would have to be a constitutional amendment to say marriage is between one man and one woman. Nothing less will do.

If this goes through... next up, NAMBLA and the Mormans/polygamy.


25 posted on 02/25/2012 7:15:40 AM PST by Reagan69 (I supported Sarah Palin and all I got was a lousy DVD !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Reagan69

The argument will be: many states’ citizens voted to CONTINUE WITH SLAVERY in their own states.

It was found unconstitutional

NO....a constitutional amendment which went into affect in Dec 1865, near the end of the civil war....without the slave states ratifying the 13th amendment...it was ratified years AFTER the Emancipation Proclamation freed the slaves.

ps I neither support slavely nor am I southern...just want to get the facts straight.

50 posted on 02/25/2012 9:15:29 AM PST by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: Reagan69

I predict it won’t be Mormons who push for polygamy, it’ll be the Muslims. It’s already happening in Great Britain.


97 posted on 02/26/2012 6:59:50 PM PST by ConjunctionJunction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson