And yet at the end of the day, the entire legal system appears to disagree with your interpretation.
WKA is the law of the land. NBC = being born on American soil. Every judge in every court from now until the end will adhered to that theory. Mark my words.
Are you dense, or what? You previously agreed with me that ROE V WADE proves that having the entire legal system agree with you does not make you wrong! And yet here you are again, repeating the same non sequitur that you tried the last time.
I have also pointed out to you that this argument is a variation of "Argumentum ad Populum" which is a logical fallacy.
If you aren't up to the task of keeping up with my level of discourse, I will spend my time otherwise. Cite a fallacy once, i'll point out that it's a fallacy. Keep citing the same fallacy and I will decide you aren't able to follow the conversation.
WKA is the law of the land. NBC = being born on American soil.
WKA does not use the term "natural born citizen." Everything that does, defines it as the children of two citizens.
Justice Gray was not so stupid as to leave out two words (natural born) unless he did so intentionally. Same thing with the 14th amendment. Your argument is crap.
Every judge in every court from now until the end will adhered to that theory. Mark my words.
That does not prove it correct. The Church held onto the Geocentric theory of the Universe even after Galileo proved it was incorrect. Black Robed Clergy in the legal profession are much like Black Robed Clergy in the religious profession. They are so infused with doctrine, that they can't even see the truth when it is pointed out to them.
Again, ROE v WADE, Lawrence v Texas, Kelo v New London, and Wickard v. Filburn are all WRONG! So unless you agree with those decisions, stop telling me that I'm wrong because a court says so. I have yet to see a court even LOOK at the evidence, so how would THEY know?