[philman_36]

We were arguing whether it was proper for the Ankeny judge to refer to it as Clause 4 vice 5.
And it appears we still are. Even your footnote says it isn't resolved.

So anyway, why did you leave off that part of the footnote?

[Harlan1196]

Who said it was resolved? I said some judges say one thing and others say another.

You said it was simply an error on the judge’s part and reflected poorly on his judgement. You were wrong.