[Harlan1196]

This is how YOU introduced the issue to this thread:

“How could the court make such an error? They made the same error many times over.”

In another thread on the same subject you wrote”

“And just to show how even the court in Ankeny can get things wrong I give you this...”

Now we know that the judge made no error. That in fact there are inconsistencies in how portions of the Constitution are labeled. There are Birther lawyers that agree with the Arkney judge. There are other states that use the same wording.

[philman_36]

Now we know that the judge made no error.
I know no such thing.

That in fact there are inconsistencies in how portions of the Constitution are labeled.
Where?

There are Birther lawyers that agree with the Arkney (sic) judge.
The ONE lawyer that you've used as an example can be just as wrong as the Ankney judge and you've provided no evidence whatsoever, as of yet, to back up your claim about Indiana.

There are other states that use the same wording.
Where? The @NH example you gave doesn't apply as it doesn't even have any mention whatsoever of any Article, Section or Clause.