Here is where the footnote comes from...
Second, the Plaintiffs argue that both President Barack Obama and Senator John McCain are not “natural born Citizens” as required for qualification to be President under Article II, Section 1, Clause 49 of the U.S. Constitution, and that therefore because neither person was constitutionally eligible to become President, “[t]he Governor . . . should [have been] prohibited by order of [the trial court] . . . from issuing any certificate of ascertainment, or any other certified statement, under the State Seal of the State of Indiana . . . .” Appellants‟ Appendix at 13.
Here is what you said...
This is what the Indiana code referenced in Arkeny says...
And this what footnote 9 says...See also Ind. Code § 3-8-1-6. Also, not only.
But what does Article 2, Section 1, clause 4 of the Constitution of the United States say compared to Clause 5?
IC 3-8-1-6 President or Vice President Sec. 6. (a) A candidate for the office of President or Vice President of the United States must have the qualifications provided in Article 2, Section 1, clause 4 of the Constitution of the United States.
What "qualifications" are there in Article 2, Section 1,
clause 4 of the Constitution of the United States that pertain to natural born citizen?
Article 2, Section 1, Clause 4
The Congress may determine the Time of chusing the Electors, and the Day on which they shall give their Votes; which Day shall be the same throughout the United States.
Isn't that a pretty damning indictment of the Indiana State legislature when their laws aren't even in accord with the Constitution of the United States?
Go read my post again and then address my actual arguments.
Show me the word “Clause” in the original Constitution.
The Indiana Code refers to the amended Constitution. A clause was removed from that section.